For many businesses, the hiring process probably begins when the corporate decides to feature a replacement role, when an employee leaves their position, or when an enormous project is arising and you would like more manpower. This is often called reactive hiring: hiring once you realize that a position must be filled.
In time gone recruiters filled roles as and once they become available. When an employee handed in their notice, the look for suitable candidates began. But lately, with employers and recruiters understanding the worth of a candidate pipeline bursting with talent, the sport has changed somewhat, and that we now take a more proactive approach with the thought that being prepared is everything.
But is there really such an enormous difference between the normal reactive method and therefore the more progressive proactive recruitment approach?
To put it simply, yes there’s, and today we’re taking a glance at why planning ahead pays dividends when they search for qualified candidates begins. But before we get there let’s first take a fast check out why the outdated reactive model must be put bent pasture.
Reactive recruitment is all about the here and now, meaning that a corporation ”reacts” to the loss of an employee by launching an employment hunt once an edge has been vacated. Reactive recruitment fills an instantaneous need for workers, instead of anticipating needs going forward.
Think of it like this. You’ve probably worked somewhere where an individual resigned or got fired from their job, creating an instantaneous hole within the coming week’s schedule and leaving the manager wondering who goes to figure the rest of that employee’s shifts. This often leads to existing employees learning the slack and covering these shifts until the manager can quickly find a replacement worker. this will take weeks or sometimes months of reading applications, conducting interviews, and training to urge a replacement employee up to hurry.
Many companies have moved far away from this sort of strategy because it puts tons of pressure on a corporation to seek out a worker – sometimes not even a perfect candidate – as quickly as possible. the corporate, in effect, has gone into panic mode.
Meaning of Reactive Recruitment:
Reactive recruitment occurs when the recruitment process is merely initiated once an invitation for a replacement member of staff is formed internally. Also referred to as passive recruitment, this method of recruitment often puts an unnecessary time-pressure on sourcing the proper candidates for the position because the need for a replacement or new team member is immediate.
Old habits prevail. And sometimes we don’t even realize that what we’re doing is wrong or outdated which there are much better ways of doing things. That’s the most reason many companies are still using reactive recruiting practices.
Reactive recruiting is that the least aggressive sort of recruiting. A reactive recruiter is waiting around for an open position or active candidate and isn’t hunting – always awaiting the simplest outcome to fall under his/her lap.
This is a typical reactive recruiting scenario that plays itself call at companies’ every day:
- A vacant position has been created because an employee is leaving or a department is expanding.
- The vacancy gets posted on the corporate job site and job boards.
- Loads of applications arrive (or maybe hardly any).
- Recruiters screen applications and choose suitable candidates for interviews.
- Line managers have no other option than to pressurize the recruiters because the work never stops.
- The interview process proceeds, and hopefully an excellent candidate is quickly identified.
- On the opposite hand, the interview process drags on for weeks without results.
- Shortlisted candidates must be assessed and verified before final selection.
- An offer is formed and accepted, but the candidate must work their notice period.
Why Reactive Recruitment Can Adversely Effect Your Business?
Taking a reactive approach to anything work-related is fraught with dangers, and this is often particularly true when it involves hiring new employees. After all, recruitment may be a stressful enough exercise without piling more pressure on your already weary shoulders.
You see, once we await roles to become vacant before actively seeking suitable candidates, we are putting unnecessary pressure on the recruitment team to deliver during a short space of your time. And unless we’re extremely lucky to seek out the right candidate who just happens to be out of labor at that moment, then our recruitment process may find yourself looking like this.
- Employee leaves role/company expands workforce
- Recruiters start trying to find suitable candidates
- Weeks pass
- The employee notice period ends
- Interviews start
- Successful candidates begin their notice period
- Weeks pass
- The new employee begins the onboarding process
Depending on the extent of the vacancy and therefore the required experience and skills, the time to rent might be anywhere from 6 to 12 weeks, from advertising the vacancy to creating a suggestion that’s accepted. then the candidate probably still has got to work their notice period which is typically between 2 to 4 weeks, at the worst two to 3 months.
Reactive recruitment practices can easily leave a vacancy standing open for 16 weeks. During that point, the work is either neglected, or the responsibilities are diverted to other staff members to try to go over and above their existing duties. Sometimes things can get so bad that a short-lived contractor has got to be appointed, often at a shocking price.
As time drags by, panic might set in, and hiring managers can make bad hiring decisions in their desperation to fill the vacancy. Hiring hurriedly results in repentance at leisure, and you’ll definitely find yourself paying the worth.